查看完整版本: Scientific Writing: Easy When You Know How

Scientific Writing: Easy When You Know How

Scientific Writing. Easy When You Know How Buy a book...  OX0~Q#lnX
5}$bv5w4LF.b
Author(s): J. Peat et al.
q ]fk_ Publisher: BMJ 6MM oB(M8k/[+c
ISBN: 0727916254
K\.U,C+Y"^O6Y Format: softback  292pp 1j,IR
o n-Bl3]
Review Date: 22 October 2002
s+F4m
H!Z(N Review: This book explains how to present you work in a biomedical paper in a journal in the best possible way. It takes you through the process from start to finish – from choosing a journal and following its guidelines, through writing and finishing your paper, to the reviewing and publishing processes. It also covers the basics of good writing: grammar, style, choice of words, and punctuation. The last chapter gives some resource systems, such as searching the Internet and writers groups.
d#Y H Pd
Kh5WadqR%g :downloads :ftext :pdf

[size=4]Scientific Writing\1G!W,D(p/u;mr&YN

?[b0N"T*{2X;Kx Scientific writing is not easy. The following resources discuss the most common mistakes and suggest some remedies. In particular the paper by John Claerbout is worthwhile reading. [/size]P^:?0_H4i4MUT%W
[size=4]4z"\`fs
[/size][font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/mahrer-05.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Still writing in passive voice?[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][font=Verdana][size=2][b] by K. D. Mahrer, TLE, 2005.[/b][/size][/font]/X6jl$r6z;j X
[font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/mahrer-01a.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Clearer Sentences - Part 1[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][font=Verdana][size=2][b] by K. D. Mahrer, TLE, 2001. [/b][/size][/font]'mz*e{B;x Y
[font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/mahrer-01.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Clearer Sentences - Part 2[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][font=Verdana][size=2][b] by K. D. Mahrer, TLE, 2001. [/b][/size][/font]^-TBm[
[font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/mahrer-00.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]A boring Test[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][size=2][font=Verdana][b] by K. D. Mahrer, TLE, 2000.[/b][/font][/size]

^/H5G\ LU iE? [font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/mahrer-00a.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Bugged by bad writing? Help break the cycle[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][font=Verdana][size=2][b] by K. D. Mahrer, TLE, 2000. [/b][/size][/font]
:FD.^x2u [font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/mahrer-99a.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Why manuscripts fail, according to 12 experts [/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][size=2][font=Verdana][b]by K. D. Mahrer, TLE, 1999. [/b][/font][/size]
4Vv,a+o&zbH [font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/mahrer-99b.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Ten common qualities of uncommonly effective writers[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][size=2][font=Verdana][b] by K. D. Mahrer, TLE, 1999.[/b][/font][/size]hP4is-R)y R
[font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/mahrer-99c.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]An open letter to authors whose native language is not English[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][font=Verdana][size=2][b] by K. D. Mahrer, TLE, 1999. [/b][/size][/font]
V
h3{W _V~ [font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/mahrer-98.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Golf swings, tennis serves, and technical writing - things we can upgrade[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][font=Verdana][size=2][b] by K. D. Mahrer, TLE, 1998. [/b][/size][/font]!u.Jv
^4| h@5B5IN
[font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/Intro.html][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Scrutiny of the introduction[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][font=Verdana][size=2][b] by J. F. Claerbout, www, 1995. [/b][/size][/font]QKH5d5@.]
[font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/fagan-93.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Some scientific writing traps [/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][size=2][font=Verdana][b]by A. J. Fagan, TLE, 1993. [/b][/font][/size]h Vh#Y)B ?W
[font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/clark.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Is there a science to writing (particular science writing) and, if not, why not?[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][font=Verdana][size=2][b] by D. Clark, TLE, 1993. [/b][/size][/font]
-`'`[a {@R.qC [font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/bryan-93.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]On scientific writing: The need for more conviction and subjectivity [/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][size=2][font=Verdana][b]by J. G. Bryan, TLE, 1993. [/b][/font][/size].n2Lc.F9h!W3K'[
[font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/lindsey-93.pdf][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]The sound of words on the printed page[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][font=Verdana][size=2][b] by J. P. Lindsey, TLE, 1993. [/b][/size][/font]
odN;Tq [font=Verdana][size=2][b][img=14,14]http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/images/blue_dot.gif[/img][/b][/size][/font][url=http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/gg/people/berndt/writing/abscrut.html][font=Verdana][size=2][color=#0000ff][b]Scrutiny of the abstract[/b][/color][/size][/font][/url][size=3][size=2][font=Verdana][b] by K. K. Landes, Geophysics, 1952.[/b][/font][/size] [/size]

[size=4][color=darkgreen]From Research to Manuscript: A Guide to Scientific Writingw ~I U8n+P%l2u+PmNJ

z-Yo1qkD [/color][/size][size=12px][size=4][color=darkgreen]ISBN: 1402040458
4d!]0@+^1X&V9\ Title: From Research to Manuscript: A Guide to Scientific Writing
2}!^2]8D/f\ Author: Michael J. Katz
,z1`9s,kL9D6B Publisher: Springer? @U?D+]y
Publication Date: 2006-03-14 uY_*\F2n [*Q5r
Number Of Pages: 152/N3~X-u+JD

aV0F j$Jw From Research to Manuscript, written in simple, straightforward language, explains how to understand and summarize a research project. It is a writing guide that goes beyond grammar and bibliographic formats, by demonstrating in detail how to compose the sections of a scientific paper. This book takes you from the data on your desk and leads you through the drafts and rewrites needed to build a thorough, clear science article. At each step, the book describes not only what to do but why and how. It discusses why each section of a science paper requires its particular form of information, and it shows how to put your data and your arguments into that form. Importantly, this writing manual recognizes that experiments in different disciplines need different presentations, and it is illustrated with examples from well-written papers on a wide variety of scientific subjects.+{%T%l8V6Fi"}
t$vN e ps:~ R"i&U
As a textbook or as an individual tutorial, From Research to Manuscript belongs in the library of every serious science writer and editor.J"z |*q5e Q#i/D
gHB)`;b/P-H6N%H{4O
下载：!_*ro!b-w8[L_&Z

)[1p5N[H [/color][/size][url=http://rapidshare.com/files/12603827/From_Research_to_Manuscript.rar.html][size=4][color=darkgreen]http://rapidshare.com/files/12603827/From_Research_to_Manuscript.rar.html[/color][/size][/url]'c o8tq,@X@{

j%Z}0n!G&u] [url=http://www.bestsharing.com/files/sSHhvXz207865/From%20Research%20to%20Manuscript.rar.html][size=4][color=darkgreen]http://www.bestsharing.com/files/sSHhvXz207865/From%20Research%20to%20Manuscript.rar.html[/color][/size][/url]
.z P(a+oq} ?z\ 'z"Acb'h
[url=http://mihd.net/2jz8gs][size=4][color=darkgreen]http://mihd.net/2jz8gs[/color][/size][/url][/size]

Writing a Good Report or Paper

[size=12px][size=4]Writing a Good Report or PapervVd'W-_o5zy
D o L1kA+M
[/size][url=http://users.aber.ac.uk/ruw/teach/340/paper.html][size=4][color=#800080]http://users.aber.ac.uk/ruw/teach/340/paper.html[/color][/size][/url] ?!O,D(VJh$]V/se
[size=4]--------------------------------------------------------------------------------m9b%O3{&GaQ:W+X2\7~
Advanced Techniques is designed to familiarise you with scientific working practice. After the experimental and theoretical work is done, it is important to write things up to make sure others don't need to reinvent the wheel. Instead you will want them to acknowledge your genius. Hence you have to write in a way to ensure that [/size][/size]md+R9Z7Sp|r
[size=12px][size=4]R4lFr?
[i]1. your readership will notice that your work is important to their work[/i]:
M |!@|P Provide a self-contained and clear [b]title[/b] and [b]abstract[/b].
Rr*[%Qw y B*M|5?]JqO
[i]2. readers who are familiar with the field but not with the particular problem treated by you can still benefit from your work[/i]:
p ?J-j:Kc&}r
O or Write an [b]Introduction[/b] section covering [b]relevant literature[/b] and [b]useful theo[/b]ry. It should also make clear why you consider the problem worthwhile working on. If there is a lot of theory, you may consider a separate theory section.
L4y-m'e0B4XJU
5cZ
SB`BO` [i]3. readers who want to check your results or further develop your technique can do so:[/i]
"{_*YII7Z;x In your [b]Experimental[/b] section, describe all relevant facts that may have influenced your results and all your operations during the experiment. Mention only experimental facts that relate to the results you show. If you have changed or improved the setup before taking data, you do not need to report your considerations that caused the change - somebody who plans to follow up on your work needs to start where you have finished. $fBZ-`F

B|5{|q [i]4. readers grasp your results at a glance:[/i]9vU#g9y.]5OO6Gg
Show plots of your results. [b]Results[/b] are the immediate data you have recorded as a function of the experimental parameters. In this section, no derived quantities should be displayed. However, you can (and should) plot the data in a way that helps the analysis. For example, if you want to determine the exponent of a power law, plot the data logarithmically. Generally, [b][color=limegreen]plots are better than tables[/color][/b], and the same information should not be presented twice. It is important to guide the reader through your results, so write some text pointing to [b][color=limegreen]the important features in the plot[/color][/b]: the position of a maximum, the linewidth, signal-to-noise, change in slope - whatever is important. But [b]DO NOT[/b] draw any conclusions at this stage. Quantify all errors in primary measured results and parameters. If you have to process your raw data (filtering, background subtraction, smoothing etc.), describe it here, quantify the errors introduced by the processing, and show an example of how it affects your raw data.
u9P+Z}#ya6Xm
oZq6S+Nw0X]-HR [i]5. you convince your readers of the point you are making:[/i]O!jg,o)_7r
In a separate [b]Discussion[/b] section, [color=limegreen][b]derive qualitatively and quantitatively[/b][/color] any properties or quantities from your data using the formulae given in the introduction or theory section. Refer to the equations rather than repeating them. A Mathcad script is not acceptable - you must describe in words [b][color=limegreen]what you do[/color][/b] and [b][color=limegreen]why you do it[/color][/b]. Analyse the propagation of errors quantitatively. The purpose of error analysis is not to blame the kit/yourself/the technician but to provide a level of confidence with the data. There are papers with horrendous error bars in the journals, but if nobody else can measure it more accurately then this is perfectly acceptable! If you can/want to derive a generalised model from your results, do it in this section; and make it accessible by drawing a sketch of its main features. &V
I6v4vU_YtF
[i]6. readers will remember the key points:[/i]
p TJr6o e8Ky Provide a short [b]Conclusions[/b] section. This is a summary without reference to literature, figures and tables, and will not normally contain formulae.
L.pNl3y`)U#N"D1x
[i]7. people who have helped you will find their contribution acknowledged[/i]W%[q)H;V"h;F
Finally, give a short list of people (if any) who have helped you, and how. Only include those in the [b]Acknowledgements[/b] who really did - there is no need to be over-polite.
(EdSN_i Z*F%}f[$z4NYj
Some further points you should keep in mind: ?6No\r|
A. [i]Plot figures on an appropriate scale[/i]. Ensure that different data sets are clearly distinguishable. If you plot lines to connect points, state in the caption whether these represent theory functions or merely guides to the eye. In the latter case - do you really need them? mz7_y2U:I

,BjJ)|$m B. [i]Make sure that all figures and tables are enumerated and have a caption describing what is on display and what the different markers stand for[/i]. Increase signal-to-noise by avoiding sentences like "a graph to show" - people know that it's a graph; and graphs are usually meant to show something. Use the figure numbers to refer to figures in the text. No figure should go without mentioning in the text!
3[2ke4Yps7igAZh
,G)@o8{e\ C. [i]When referring to other people's work, you can use either of two formats, but be consistent with it[/i]. Either enumerate references[1] or refer to the papers by using the name of the first author (Author 2002a). Then list the references at the end of the papers like this:
~V1e&Nmk p [1] A.N. Author, A.N. Other, J. Irrepr. Res. 23 (2002) 456
!FX5xbP1l+@&E Author 2002a; A.N. Author, A.N. Other, J. Irrepr. Res. 23 (2002) 456;A;?^e%B
In the example, 23 is the volume, 456 the number of the first page, and 2002 the year of publication. In the second format, distinguish different papers by the same author from the same year by a,b,... after the year of publication. You can also cite books, other people's lab reports or scientific gossip:
+dUZ;e:DR;Fv [3] HC van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles, Dover Publ., New York 1981, p.123
+L
l3@z5HwHR"r [4] ER van Hoek, Gravel, Mud, and Avalanches, UWA group project report, 2001
5|H S1c(_:H'? [5] MY Colleague, unpublished
h1S;B!tre h$E The latter makes sense e.g. if you want to make clear that a group who did the experiment earlier has given you a vital clue. When citing from a book, always refer to the particular page or section that is relevant in the context.
,~(w`n,q+Uv B!R {)H%O+OdC
D. Before you submit your report or paper, [color=purple][b]read it, sleep a night, and read it once again[/b][/color]. Incomplete sentences and misguided formatting can easily be avoided this way. These really are important issues - if you make yourself easily understood people will be more receptive of the point you're making. It's your work - be proud of it![/size][/size]

[size=12px][size=4][b]Writing Skills Success in 20 Minutes a Day (Learning Express Skill Builders)[/b]+YC3^n|~6|WiQ
$V_-n4s_8]X r#K
[/size][url=http://pixhost.eu/avaxhome/big_show.php?/avaxhome/2006-12-19/1576851281_orig.jpg][size=4][img]http://pixhost.eu/avaxhome/avaxhome/2006-12-19/1576851281.jpg[/img][/size][/url]
6Zy
f"YP~
D\U+D*B
s/zQnw|6Ou [size=4]&y*wCl*qO,Ex n_
LearningExpress | ISBN 1576851281 | January 1, 1998 | CHM | 0.5 Mb | 208 Pages? b)u:|fRS
,nd5m/b\q1{UW
Anyone preparing to take a job-related exam that tests for basic language, math, and/or critical thinking skills. High school or [/size][url=http://www.avaxhome.ru/ebooks/1576851281.html#][color=blue][font=Times New Roman][size=12pt][size=4][font=Times New Roman][size=12pt]college [/size][/font][font=Times New Roman][size=12pt]students[/size][/font][/size][/size][/font][/color][/url][size=4] and adults who basic skills improvement to perform better in the classroom or on the job. ,D`3]K
[^*H%Og

k8SQTZ$u [/size][url=http://www.ftp2share.com/file/9217/Writing%20Skills%20Success%20In%2020%20Minutes%20A%20Day.chm.html][size=4][color=#810081]http://www.ftp2share.com/file/9217/Writing Skills Success In 20 Minutes A Day.chm.html[/color][/size][/url][/size]

Writing Skills Success in 20 Minutes a Day 6_AK#FtYK
:rs
K+z&?TNcN **** Hidden Message *****

回复 #1 Doctor_Philip 的帖子

hehe ,xiexie louzhu a ,haotie a

跟帖了！！ up

xie xie fen xiang ,hao dong xi

多谢！下载下来看看！

好东东，学习下。~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

什么呀？看看吧！！！

多谢！下载下来看看！

多谢！下载下来看看！

kankan a :lol

Pefect.Pefect.

a good paper for us

回复 #6 Doctor_Philip 的帖子

Scientific Writing. Easy When You Know How Buy a book

cmftR)Ozo'?d2]j]X
看看，嘿嘿

Scientific Writing

最怕写文章，哈哈，要是有软件可以写文章的话就好了