查看完整版本: 经典的文章"The Science of Scientific Writing"

经典的文章"The Science of Scientific Writing"

这是American Scientist(1990)上的一篇非常经典的文章"The Science of Scientific Writing"，共17页。wL k}}D`
-j6t"_5t(W2W
[font=Arial][b][size=6]The Science of Scientific Writing[/size][/b][/font]4dIz2jXWMP

x5cy%}s,j0g$@ [size=4][i]If the reader is to grasp what the writer means, the writer must understand what the reader needs[/i][/size]4muG$|,[R_

:n)e~ VK-SnCSU'X!S Information is interpreted more easily and more uniformly if it is placed where most readers expect to find it.
f*lm(GvU O!vA8\8bJVec.?
Beginning with the exciting material and ending with a lack of luster often leaves us disappointed and destroys our sense of momentum.X*hl$n1y0Ej6}h(A

$g/P&ZK6L7]&pB We cannot succeed in making even a single sentence mean one and only one thing; we can only increase the odds that a large majority of readers
(t6F?(i?~6z!I will tend to interpret our discourse according to our intentions. The information that begins a sentence establishes for the reader a perspective for viewing the sentence as a unit.
XZ\Z!`l
a"@o-a&od In our experience, the misplacement of old and new information turns out to be he No. 1 problem in American professional writing today.
4c+t(LUe)mFn
+u9S Q3u H+A6? w5\ Put in the topic position the old information that links backward; put in the stress position the new information you want the reader to emphasize.x/EA#h0s
L'ge.dg4dIcQ]
As critical scientific readers, we would like to concentrate our energy on whether the experiments prove the hypotheses.$VZ |;F7K

I.a&z]/V4v.A"mq It may seem obvious that a scientific document is incomplete without the interpretation of the writer; it may not be so obvious that the document cannot "exist" without the interpretation of each reader.

:) thx for sharing this paper

多谢！学习中

好东西 :audio

好文章.看看

多谢楼主的贡献:handshake :handshake

好文章我也要看看。谢谢。

thanks  :good :good :good :good :good

多谢分享，很好的文章。:D :D :D :D :D

:handshake :victory: :victory:

:good1 :good1 :good1

谢谢您的分享:handshake